Learners launch InstruQ from inside their programme — there's nothing to sign up for here.
Telling you the answer would displace the very thinking you're here to build. InstruQ holds a hard line: three coaching modes, and none of them is "lecture".
Under every conversation sits a per-learner knowledge graph and a curriculum defined entirely as data. Nothing generic; nothing bolted on.
Concepts, prerequisites, tasks and sources arrive as a versioned schema — clinical today, any discipline tomorrow.
Cases, decisions, reflections. InstruQ coaches in the moment, picking its next move from your own journey graph.
A precision-biased pipeline recognises what you actually did — and stays silent when it isn't sure.
Formative xAPI statements flow to your programme's learning record store. Judgement stays with human assessors.
InstruQ is subject-agnostic by architecture: a curriculum arrives as data — concepts, prerequisites, sources, evidence shapes — and the sparring engine does the rest. Clinical education is simply our first programme; engineering, law, teaching practice, or any workplace curriculum drops into the same graph.
Every encounter, connection and struggle lives in your own temporal graph. Session two opens where session one truly left off — not where a syllabus says you should be.
InstruQ gauges readiness before it provokes: prerequisites first, spaced reuse before skills fade, a different route when something isn't landing.
Everything InstruQ records is formative and carries no marks, no scores, no verdicts. It notices what happened; deciding what it's worth stays human.
Identity-blind by architecture. InstruQ never sees your name, email, or role — only an opaque reference issued by your programme. Every learner's graph is a separately-sealed store; no learner can ever be compared to another inside the system; and erasure removes every trace, attested and signed.